Always looking for a better OS but back to mint again. Easy, productive and 99.9 percent bug free. I keep finding more quirks Ubunto my second favorite and although some other distros are good they are missing stuff. Any takers? TRG you especially.
Take a look at PCLinuxOS, Hip. I've been running it as my "daily driver" for almost 20 years now. For those rare occasions when I need Windows, mostly for family and friends tech support, I pop it up with Oracle's VirtualBox VM, no rebooting needed.This past weekend, I dumped Manjaro and now I'm running Arcolinux with XFCE DE. Very different than Manjaro and still have some bugs, mostly scaling to work out but man is it nice
For tinkerers, the rolling releases are "fun" but for those who just want their computers to do computerly things, a less bleeding edge distribution is certainly easier. Arch and all of its derivatives (including Manjaro and Arco) are the likes of what gave Linux a bad name in the first place -- requiring applications to be built before you could use them.This past weekend, I dumped Manjaro and now I'm running Arcolinux with XFCE DE. Very different than Manjaro and still have some bugs, mostly scaling to work out but man is it nice
At least with PCLOS, the rolling releases allow me to see what's new and determine when and which updates I want now and which I want to let "age" a bit to see if anyone else reports any problems. Oh, and I'm long past the "tinkerer" stage of my life. As I said, PCLOS has been my daily driver OS for close to 20 years. I've also taught seniors computing classes using it, and converted several companies from Windows to either Red Hat or PCLOS over the years.For tinkerers, the rolling releases are "fun" but for those who just want their computers to do computerly things, a less bleeding edge distribution is certainly easier.
I really like the way Arch works and you don't have to build apps any longer. I either use pacman, pamac or yay to install just about anything or download the binaries and use chmod but mostly, when U used Ubuntu and Mint, they gave me bad attitude about Linux. Arch reinvigorated me.For tinkerers, the rolling releases are "fun" but for those who just want their computers to do computerly things, a less bleeding edge distribution is certainly easier. Arch and all of its derivatives (including Manjaro and Arco) are the likes of what gave Linux a bad name in the first place -- requiring applications to be built before you could use them.
Getting warnings about software being old is a downer with Debian and derivatives but the neat part is that you can find a .deb for almost everything where you may not find other formats of packaged software.
I'm trying to motivate myself to try Fedora but it seems to have a lot of the same package issues (.rpm) and I'm just not a fan of appimages, flatpacks and the increasingly invasive snap packs.
I can't remember the last time I compiled an app, but it was probably an experimental alpha or beta app. With PCLOS, all of the updates for everything I have installed are handled by the Synaptic Package Manager. PCLOS uses an update notifier to display a flag on the systray when updates are available. One stop "shopping"...I really like the way Arch works and you don't have to build apps any longer. I either use pacman, pamac or yay to install just about anything or download the binaries and use chmod but mostly, when U used Ubuntu and Mint, they gave me bad attitude about Linux. Arch reinvigorated me.
Arch does the same thing. Many Distros are pretty polished enough to be DD's and come with installers, normally Calamares.PCLOS uses an update notifier to display a flag on the systray when updates are available. One stop "shopping"...
Does Arch offer a bootable DVD download? I recall Arch was in the mix years ago when I was still searching for "the one" that fit my needs best among the 11 distros I had installed at the same time on one PC. Maybe I should take a look to see what the developers have been up to these days.Arch does the same thing. Many Distros are pretty polished enough to be DD's and come with installers, normally Calamares.
You can burn the ISO to a bootable drive, although DVD's have been more or less replaced by thumb drives. I'm sure Rufus on a Windows machine would work. Not sure what the best package is for creating bootable drives on Linux.Does Arch offer a bootable DVD download? I recall Arch was in the mix years ago when I was still searching for "the one" that fit my needs best among the 9 distros I had installed at the same time on one PC. Maybe I should take a look to see what the developers have been up to these days.
Ok, I'll see if I have a thumb drive big enough that's not currently in use. Thanks!You can burn the ISO to a bootable drive, although DVD's have been more or less replaced by thumb drives. I'm sure Rufus on a Windows machine would work. Not sure what the best package is for creating bootable drives on Linux.
If you're going to play with Arch a bit, I'd use EndeavorOS or Manjaro, They're probably the most complete packages out of the box.Ok, I'll see if I have a thumb drive big enough that's not currently in use. Thanks!