Right, no Internet, no TV, no news, no worries!wont have to worry, because there is no internet here![]()

Right, no Internet, no TV, no news, no worries!wont have to worry, because there is no internet here![]()
Yeah, I think it's the AT&T management regarding this. AT&T is working to ditch the satellites, after all.How utterly disappointing, if true, that a true 4k receiver is a year away. AT&T has REALLY fallen behind Dish on the hardware front.
So they just acquired DIRECTV so they could use the clipart satellites in the background of all of their slides?John says they did not buy DIRECTV for its satellite technology.
I might have missed a refernce to the ATSC 3.0 standardWhy does the ATSC 3.0 standards have anything to do with AT&T waiting for a year to release a new STB that does 4K via it's HDMI and not needing a client? AT&T doesn't care about OTA reception anymore so that's not the reason for a holdup.
I don't think the speaker was talking about ATSC 3.0. I think DTV is waiting for an HDR standard to be adopted for the UHD (4K) format. There are a number of HDR standards, but Dolby's Dolby Vision and HDR10 are the most likely to be adopted. However, Oppo UHD Blu-ray players are now shipping with the ability to run either Dolby Vision or HDR10 with a subsequent firmware update. Some UHD TV's even offer both, as well. Let's face it, DTV just does not want to invest any money AT ALL in a 4K STB. As a consumer, it is wise to wait, but not necessarily for DTV, especially when they aren't really interested in making a 4K STB.Why does the ATSC 3.0 standards have anything to do with AT&T waiting for a year to release a new STB that does 4K via it's HDMI and not needing a client? AT&T doesn't care about OTA reception anymore so that's not the reason for a holdup.
Add to that no telephone if one is using a VoIP phone service to replace telco phone service.Right, no Internet, no TV, no news, no worries!![]()
Thanks!!Scott met with DirecTV at their conference yesterday, I don't believe there was another meeting planned. As I would expect from AT&T, they were very tight lipped about anything that is future potential for DirecTV.
Perhaps the biggest, which I would say was not unexpected, is that they have no new hardware on the forefront in 2017 for the DirecTV platform.
Yes, that would suck ...What about all the RV'ers out there that use satellite as their primary way to receive TV? Will they have to go wireless internet?
What about all the RV'ers out there that use satellite as their primary way to receive TV? Will they have to go wireless internet?
I would like to be able to have a Genie in the Motor home, but thats not gonna happen seeing I have 1 in the home.DirecTV receivers will continue to work fine in RVs that work today. If more recent equipment is desired, they can shift to Dish. But if what they have today works, why change? Especially as that change may cost some bucks with new dish antennas. In my experience, RVers don't need the latest and greatest. Full timers might, though.
ATT may be betting big on their broadband over power lines advance. But they have years to go. If they find it ain't the panacea they think it is, they can still update their satellite fleet and receivers. And if it IS so great, a lot of campgrounds will use it if there aren't better alternatives, to offer some $ervice to campers.
Personally, I don't think they're going to roll out that broadband solution to areas where homes are ten miles apart. I haven't seen the economics, but I'll bet even a couple miles apart might be stretching it.
Add to that no telephone if one is using a VoIP phone service to replace telco phone service..
Just curious - does that LA in your username mean Los Angeles? If so, you are in a different world than most places. Millions of current Directv customers can't get sufficient Internet to stream. I can stream "The Man In the High Castle" in 4K at night. And do nothing else online, including visit this forum. It skips a lot during the day. 1 HD stream will work. More than 1, and you really have 0. I simply won't be able to keep my favorite TV service if the talk of "no satellites" and "Directv Now" which is missing a lot of content is true. About 2 months ago, I got a letter in the mail saying that faster speeds were available in my area. I got it. Now I have 50 mbps Internet. I am sure in LA anything under 150 is considered dial-up.
No one is disagreeing with you......but...You wont get anything from dish as they have nothing....I have been complaining about the sound drops on the 4K. I too want to know about a software fix. If it is not done soon, I will go to dish.
And Amazon has more....again....you gain nothing other than eating bandwidth up.....If your lucky enough to have good download speeds.....Dish does. It have any live linear 4K currently. However their 4K VOD library is much larger than DIRECTV's. The big issue with that is you need broadband to enjoy it.
Sent from my iPhone using the SatelliteGuys app!