Not like Dish cant afford it as I was right with our rates going up if we had Disney HD or not.
Good Dish pay Disney the interest you own. Greedy dirtbag Dish CEO.
Good Dish pay Disney the interest you own. Greedy dirtbag Dish CEO.
Not like Dish cant afford it as I was right with our rates going up if we had Disney HD or not.
Good Dish pay Disney the interest you own. Greedy dirtbag Dish CEO.
Has Hell frozen over yet? That's when you can expect a resolution to the Dish vs Disney dispute.
no need to downconvert..just use the svideo output on their vip211 reciversHonestly, I don't see a resolution of this , till they allow DISH to pick just HD channels and allow the down covert for sd customers. Paying TWICE for the same channel in both sd and HD versions would be the death knell for the idea of FREE HD. If sat and cable companies have to pay twice for the different versions, you could expect your bill to double over night . A dangerous precedent that should never be allowed to happen. I support DISH on this wholeheartedly.
Actually, I think the appeals court basically agreed with E*'s position. Disney will probably not want to go to trial on this. This should allow for some kind of settlement between E* & Disney.Honestly, I don't see a resolution of this , till they allow DISH to pick just HD channels and allow the down covert for sd customers. Paying TWICE for the same channel in both sd and HD versions would be the death knell for the idea of FREE HD. If sat and cable companies have to pay twice for the different versions, you could expect your bill to double over night . A dangerous precedent that should never be allowed to happen. I support DISH on this wholeheartedly.
Further, there is ambiguity in the "Most-Favored Nations"
clause of the ESPN agreement, which provides that Disney will not
give competing distributors a lower "Net Effective Rate" than
EchoStar's based on rates reduced by, inter alia, "in-kind
consideration." A factfinder could reasonably conclude that the
high definition networks that Disney provided to EchoStar's
competitors for no additional charge constituted "in-kind
consideration" within the meaning of the clause.
Actually, I think the appeals court basically agreed with E*'s position. Disney will probably not want to go to trial on this. This should allow for some kind of settlement between E* & Disney.
Actually, I think the appeals court basically agreed with E*'s position. Disney will probably not want to go to trial on this. This should allow for some kind of settlement between E* & Disney.
Here's the link. Go to page 19 of the pdf. I hit the highlights in post #433.Can someone point to the link of the appeal courts ruling?
From what I have heard DISNEY is appealing the ruling.
Since DISNEY authorizes the HD receivers that the uplink uses DISH can not do anything until DISNEY turns them back on. And its likely DISNEY will not authorize DISH's uplink receivers for the HD services until the appeal is heard and ruled upon.