How desperate is the government for Barry Bonds??!!

[HD MM]

Wow. looking at your pictures I would never had guessed.

OK, I got no room to talk either. About 15 lbs. too heavy, or I am I "vertically challenged"?

I go by the saying: "Live to eat", not "Eat to live".

 

[cybok0]

I go by the saying: "Live to eat", not "Eat to live".

:up

 

[Paul Wozniak]

I'm on the seafood diet, you know how the rest goes....

 

[Paul Wozniak]

Right........

So you're saying that if this guy would be able to "stay healthy" for 162 games he would hit 60 homers a year? I'm sure the increased muscle mass had nothing to do with the spike in numbers. It was all about health.

Is that Salsa from Little League? I didn't know he was a switch hitter.

 

[SandraC]

That has no meaning to my post.

Your posts have meaning???

Besides, you can only use :tux: until the middle of April anyway. Then this year it goes away until October...


Sandra

 

[SandraC]

Is that Salsa from Little League? I didn't know he was a switch hitter.

Wow, I didn't know salsa was a switch hitter either!

And here I thought he was joking about the dancing...


Sandra

 

[Paul Wozniak]

Wow, I didn't know salsa was a switch hitter either!

And here I thought he was joking about the dancing...


Sandra

I heard from one of his students that he was a "little light in his loafers".

 

[salsadancer7]

Is that Salsa from Little League? I didn't know he was a switch hitter.

DAMN!!! I gotta get out of the sun!! AND LOOK what it did to my hair!!!!!!

 

[salsadancer7]

I heard from one of his students that he was a "little light in his loafers".

The student was jealous that I turned down his 'offer'....I told him that I play for the 'other' team...

 

[Paul Wozniak]

The student was jealous that I turned down his 'offer'....I told him that I play for the 'other' team...

Would that have been FSU?

 

[salsadancer7]

Back to subject, here is the desperation by the government I am talking about:

During a hearing in San Francisco, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston indicated she will bar prosecutors from using what they say are records showing the slugger tested positive for steroids three times in 2000 and 2001. Despite prosecutors' objections, Illston said the steroid tests were not admissible because there is no concrete link proving the urine and blood samples belonged to Bonds. Such a finding would remove a cornerstone of the government's evidence when the case reaches trial next month.

So does this mean they have stooped to where they are grabbing anybody's urine sample?? So this could have been someone else?? With ALL the resources that the government has, this seems like a pretty lame trick or a serious rookie mistake on their part.

 

[salsadancer7]

Would that have been FSU?

WHO knows....LOL!

 

[SandraC]

Back to subject, here is the desperation by the government I am talking about:



So does this mean they have stooped to where they are grabbing anybody's urine sample?? So this could have been someone else?? With ALL the resources that the government has, this seems like a pretty lame trick or a serious rookie mistake on their part.

Was the government responsible for maintaining the urine samples since 2000?

They are trying to collect all the evidence they can. That's what prosecutors do. Doesn't mean they're desperate, means they're doing their jobs.


Sandra

 

[SandraC]

I heard from one of his students that he was a "little light in his loafers".

Now you have to wonder about Rafael Palmeiro and Sammy Sosa too...


Sandra

 

[salsadancer7]

Was the government responsible for maintaining the urine samples since 2000?

They are trying to collect all the evidence they can. That's what prosecutors do. Doesn't mean they're desperate, means they're doing their jobs.

Sandra

BUT they ARE responsible to AT LEAST make sure it IS Barry Bonds' urine sample! It may not their responsibility to maintain....but it IS to make absolutley double and triple sure it IS Barry Bonds' pee!

 

[SandraC]

BUT they ARE responsible to AT LEAST make sure it IS Barry Bonds' urine sample! It may not their responsibility to maintain....but it IS to make absolutley double and triple sure it IS Barry Bonds' pee!

That's what the subpoena was for.


Sandra

 

[Skyhi]

BUT they ARE responsible to AT LEAST make sure it IS Barry Bonds' urine sample! It may not their responsibility to maintain....but it IS to make absolutley double and triple sure it IS Barry Bonds' pee!

No. It's the jury's job to decide whose pee it is. The prosecutor presents evidence of how the sample was collected, how it was handled/stored etc....The jury gets to decide (not in this case, though) if the evidence is credible.

 

[salsadancer7]

No. It's the jury's job to decide whose pee it is. The prosecutor presents evidence of how the sample was collected, how it was handled/stored etc....The jury gets to decide (not in this case, though) if the evidence is credible.

The evidence of whether it is doped...not whether the evidence is actually HIS urine. Sorry, but IF you cannot prove with DNA on whether it is even HIS URINE....no wonder the judge might thorw it out.

 

[cosmo_kramer]

Just when you think this thread couldn't sink any lower, a new angle develops. Now we're discussing the validity of Barry Bonds* urine sample?

What's next, Bonds* and the likelihood of testicular atrophy??

 

[cybok0]

Your posts have meaning???

Besides, you can only use :tux: until the middle of April anyway. Then this year it goes away until October...


Sandra

Well if you would of been here before April of last year, you would realize that yes they do.