PBS mux on 125W moving around...preparing for changes
- Thread starter Mr Tony
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 232
- Views 36K
- Status
H.264 has been part of the ATSC standards since 2008. Broadcasters could use H.264 over ATSC if they wanted to, but they'd rather accommodate stubborn people who don't want to update their equipment to handle a codec that is not 16 years old, so we all must suffer with MPEG-2 because of people with MPEG-2 only equipment dragging us down. The only way to bypass the quality problem is to bypass the middlemen who are ruining the quality of our television in the first place; the network affiliates.
And yes, while the situation does seem to be deteriorating amongst the broadcast networks, most NBC affiliates are around 15 Mbps nowadays; there's many full bitrate 16+ Mbps CBS affiliates around; and the way Fox is distributed most, if not all Fox affiliates should be 720p @ 14 Mbps. CW varies wildly. And we all know that ABC affiliates are terrible, typically 8-12 Mbps @ 720p. The only network which manages to routinely look worse than PBS.
Again. It's not required. They could leave all the viewers with equipment that can only handle MPEG-2 in the dark if they wanted to. They would rather cater to the lowest common denominator, however. I refer to these LCDs as "noob viewers."
720p does not have more pixels/second than 1080i. You pulled that one out of thin air. 1080i broadcasts at 60 fields per second with each field consisting of 1,036,800 pixels. These fields are then de-interlaced on the fly by your equipment to 1080p video @ 30 frames per second with 2,073,600 pixels to a frame.
720p broadcasts at 60 frames per second with each frame consisting of 921,600 pixels. That's it. And most sources used aren't even true 60 frames per second; many 720p broadcasts are actually using sources shot at 29.97 and the frames are then duplicated to 60 for 720p60 broadcast
Most PBS affiliates run at 11 Mbps. It's pathetic. That disturbingly low bitrate will introduce enough artifacts of its own that it diminishes any quality that may be gained by having a higher source material.
Last edited:
This post is so full of ignorance, I'm not sure where to start.
1920 x 540 x 60000/1001 = 62145854 pixels/sec
720p has more temporal resolution. 1080i has more spatial resolution. Fox and Disney/ABC/ESPN chose 720p because of sports. By the time you account for kell factor (which I was) and the coding inefficiency of interlaced MPEG-2 (relative to progressive), 1080i doesn't always have the obvious advantage you seem to believe it does. It's highly unlikely your TV has a better deinterlacer than your local station. Even if it did, it would be downstream their horrible, antique relic of an MPEG-2 encoder. For a telecined source (film), 1080i is certainly superior.
Congratulations on being the 1% (of TV snobs).
Remember that digital conversion thing that took >10 years? Where Congress had to push the deadline multiple times and subsidize tuners so that NTSC could end? You expect to repeat that process barely three years later and make OTA viewers buy another new TV? Just because ATSC added AVC in A/73 doesn't mean anyone supports it. A/53 also has a 16VSB mode that nobody uses. The FCC incorporated A/53 only (and not even the newest version).
Certainly no broadcaster is going willingly lose viewers by switching to AVC. The FCC mandate for DTV is to replicate NTSC service, so there would still have to be an SD MPEG-2 program in the mux anyway. Your dream of 18 Mbit/s AVC will never happen. Wait for ATSC 2.0 or 3.0.
1280 x 720 x 60000/1001 = 55240759 pixels/sec
1920 x 540 x 60000/1001 = 62145854 pixels/sec
720p has more temporal resolution. 1080i has more spatial resolution. Fox and Disney/ABC/ESPN chose 720p because of sports. By the time you account for kell factor (which I was) and the coding inefficiency of interlaced MPEG-2 (relative to progressive), 1080i doesn't always have the obvious advantage you seem to believe it does. It's highly unlikely your TV has a better deinterlacer than your local station. Even if it did, it would be downstream their horrible, antique relic of an MPEG-2 encoder. For a telecined source (film), 1080i is certainly superior.
Given a fixed output bitrate, a better input will yield better output. It's irrelevant that the output is 11 Mbit/s (pathetic or not). CBR at that rate is crap, but maybe not if that's the long-term average within a statmux.
Congratulations on being the 1% (of TV snobs).
30fps stutters too much (especially on a CRT). Any respectable TV will bob 1080@30i to 1080@60p.
Xizer said:
Thanks for backing up my statement?
Also, I had to laugh at this:
Perhaps not, but I don't use my TV's deinterlacer. All my content is viewed after being rendered by my PC first.
"Professional" grade equipment is highly overrated. It never ceases to amaze me when I see stations dropping tens of thousands of dollars on proprietary equipment that actually does an inferior job of processing content compared to what my consumer-level PC can do.
I'd bet $1,000 that my consumer level graphics card does a better job of de-interlacing content than whatever machine my local affiliates would use.
it looks like those feeds with the symbol rate of 4444 went DVB-S2. At least they were last night (the 12175 H 4444 was still DVB)
crazy thing.....the Micro didnt even need a rescan. It just changed over (and the signal is alot lower on those than when they were DVB)
crazy thing.....the Micro didnt even need a rescan. It just changed over (and the signal is alot lower on those than when they were DVB)
Yep, I'm getting DVB-S2 on those except for that one feed you mentioned. Quality still seems the same here, at 71% ... if it is lower, it's only by a few percentage points (I can't remember if those were at 75 or 71 for me before)
Hello, Since I just got my 125 West back up, can someone please adivse me what transponders are active. I know their moving things around up there. Did a scan and only came up with 12140, pretty strong though. I am just checking. Thanks!
everything is still up there as of today
vertical side
12106 V 2397** Montana
12114 V 8703** Oklahoma
12060 V 30000
12140 V 30000
12180 V 30000**
Horizontal
12150 H 14028
12163 H 4444**
12169 H 4444**
12175 H 4444
**-DVB-S2 transponders
vertical side
12106 V 2397** Montana
12114 V 8703** Oklahoma
12060 V 30000
12140 V 30000
12180 V 30000**
Horizontal
12150 H 14028
12163 H 4444**
12169 H 4444**
12175 H 4444
**-DVB-S2 transponders
Iceberg,
Got them all. Thanks! I needed to go back out and make better adjustments. I may have to go back out once I receive my new Geosatpro SL1PLL and fine tune!
Got them all. Thanks! I needed to go back out and make better adjustments. I may have to go back out once I receive my new Geosatpro SL1PLL
and fine tune!Well they FINALLY did the changeover.....sort of
12150 H 14028 GONE
12163 H 4444 DVB-S2
12169 H 4444 DVB-S2
12175 H 4444 DVB still
12060 V 30000
HD "feed".....black screen
SD "feed"....black screen
Create and V-Me has a scroll on the bottom about the channels leaving and a HUGE blue banner across the middle
World...black screen
Ironically PBS E & W HD (12140) is still up.
12150 H 14028 GONE
12163 H 4444 DVB-S2
12169 H 4444 DVB-S2
12175 H 4444 DVB still
12060 V 30000
HD "feed".....black screen
SD "feed"....black screen
Create and V-Me has a scroll on the bottom about the channels leaving and a HUGE blue banner across the middle
World...black screen
Ironically PBS E & W HD (12140) is still up.
Attachments
also there are now 2 DVB-S2 HD feeds replacing the 12150 H 14028 feed
12145 H 6250
12155 H 6250
12145 H 6250
12155 H 6250
I gave up trying to keep track of this until they finally turn whatever off for good. Then I'll scan the correct Tp's and be done with it lol...The banner running across the screen is annoying too.
Me too. I will miss them while they are gome. Wake me up when they come back.:
They are still there.
12180 V 30000
DVB-S2
PBS HD E, W, Create, V-Me and World
Bah! Can anyone with a Diamond 9000HD confirm whether or not they get 12180? This thing is driving me nuts...
- Status
