NHL Hockey 2009-10 Season

Don't look now, but the Red Wings are starting to move upward.
3 points out of 6th and counting ...... they were 9th at the break and out of the playoffs.

I know it's early yet, but they all count at this point of the year.
 
Nice to see the Wings play the Blackhawks in Chicago this afternoon - surprised nobody mentioned it. Anyway, the Good-Guys (Wings) win 5-4 on the road. It wasn't exactly textbook hockey, but entertaining nonetheless.


I watched part of this game, and the Wings absolutely EXPLODED in the 2nd period!!!

As always, they are a SCARY team if they get it rolling!
 
Detroit will be a very interesting team to watch in the playoffs if they make it (they're in a dogfight with Calgary for the #8 seed with a month remaining).

I don't think it would matter if they're a low playoff seed- remember what the Ducks did last year as the last playoff team in the West.
 
Detroit will be a very interesting team to watch in the playoffs if they make it (they're in a dogfight with Calgary for the #8 seed with a month remaining).

I don't think it would matter if they're a low playoff seed- remember what the Ducks did last year as the last playoff team in the West.

Sabre's,
Ya got to learn to look at it from the positive side, they are only 1 point out of 7th and 6 out of 6th which btw belongs to Colorado, the team that is in FIRST place in thier particular division.

fwiw, Detroit plays Calgary on Tuesday :)
 
Last edited:
Jimbo, I wasn't bashing the Wings.

What I said was that the Wings, should they make the playoffs (and I think they will), would be a fascinating team to watch, if only for the fact that they could be playing the role of an underdog after having so many powerhouse teams.

Plus, we've seen playoff runs from low seeds (2003, 2004, 2006- the West's #7, #6, and #8 seeds, respectively, made the Stanley Cup Finals).

After seeing them as a #1 or a #2 seed for a long time, it'll be interesting to see what they could do depending on the position they end up with should they make it.

Plus, they made back-to-back Cup Finals- combined with what I mentioned about low playoff seeds... they could make some noise in the Spring.
 
Jimbo, I wasn't bashing the Wings.

What I said was that the Wings, should they make the playoffs (and I think they will), would be a fascinating team to watch, if only for the fact that they could be playing the role of an underdog after having so many powerhouse teams.

Plus, we've seen playoff runs from low seeds (2003, 2004, 2006- the West's #7, #6, and #8 seeds, respectively, made the Stanley Cup Finals).

After seeing them as a #1 or a #2 seed for a long time, it'll be interesting to see what they could do depending on the position they end up with should they make it.

Plus, they made back-to-back Cup Finals- combined with what I mentioned about low playoff seeds... they could make some noise in the Spring.

Didn't think you were bashing them at all.

Keep in mind they finally have most of thier injured players back, if not for the very difficult rash of injuries this year they would be up in the top end where they normally are.
IF they make it, they will be a difficult out.

They DO have a rookie goaltender going into the playoffs though and you know how important a hot goalie is.
 
You live in Jersey. People would understand. ;)

Rangers fans are jerks, we're idiots for rooting for such a stupid team, we throw money at the Dolans by filling up the arena each and every night forever, regardless of the product they put on the ice, and we still have an obsession with Denis Potvin, a guy who retired from the Stinklanders around 20 years ago. We still chant his name at every game to this day...and not in a good way.

We're also arguably masochists, morons, as obnoxious as any fans in all of sport, and we will argue until the end of time about what this team needs to do to improve...and not in a good way.

But there is one more thing Rangers fans are. Loyal. The loyalty of Ranger fans in the New York area is legendary.

Football is a different animal because they play only eight home games, but of all the other sports, the only team that sells out night in and night out, regardless of the standings, is the New York Rangers. Difficult to remember now, but for part of the 1980's and 1990's, even the Yankees did not draw very well. People were annoyed at the product on the field, and they went to a lot of games dressed as empty chairs. Same for the Knicks and Mets. The Nets, Devils, and the Circus team from Long Island can barely fill out half their arena in the best of times, let alone when their teams are bad.

But Ranger fans are among the most passionate in all of sports. A Ranger game is almost like a Utah State game, with all the chanting, singing, and rituals we do at every game. Regardless of the scoreboard or the standings, Devil fans will always be second class citizens in hockey world in this area.

But at least second class is higher than the low-rent district of the front-running, bad-teeth, bad-breath, unwashed, hockey-challenged, Potvin-worshipping, Mausoleum-inhabiting, joke of a franchise to the east.


Sandra
 
We're also arguably masochists, morons, as obnoxious as any fans in all of sport, and we will argue until the end of time about what this team needs to do to improve...and not in a good way.

But there is one more thing Rangers fans are. Loyal. The loyalty of Ranger fans in the New York area is legendary.

But Ranger fans are among the most passionate in all of sports.
Sandra


Scary, but if I didn't know any better, you just described the typical Red Sox fan! :eek:

I've never thought about it before now, but there are a lot of parallels between the Rangers and Red Sox and their fan bases.

Just replace 2004 with 1994............................:D
 
Scary, but if I didn't know any better, you just described the typical Red Sox fan! :eek:

I've never thought about it before now, but there are a lot of parallels between the Rangers and Red Sox and their fan bases.

Just replace 2004 with 1994............................:D

Very true Bill. I remember a lot of people before 1994 saying if the Rangers ever won the Cup, people would stop caring about the team. I heard the same about the Red Sox before 2004. In both cases that is epically incorrect.

One huge difference though...the Red Sox got that second championship not long afterward, and the Rangers have not. Our futility has started again. In that respect we are more like Cub fans than Red Sox fans, although there is admittedly a huge difference when one team's last championship is 1994, and another is 1906.

One more very big difference. The Red Sox have one of the sharpest GM's in the game running their team, and the Rangers have a buffoon running theirs. :(


Sandra
 
Very true Bill. I remember a lot of people before 1994 saying if the Rangers ever won the Cup, people would stop caring about the team. I heard the same about the Red Sox before 2004. In both cases that is epically incorrect.

One huge difference though...the Red Sox got that second championship not long afterward, and the Rangers have not. Our futility has started again. In that respect we are more like Cub fans than Red Sox fans, although there is admittedly a huge difference when one team's last championship is 1994, and another is 1906.

One more very big difference. The Red Sox have one of the sharpest GM's in the game running their team, and the Rangers have a buffoon running theirs. :(


Sandra


Sandra, at least your hockey team has won a championship since the advent of cable television! :eek:

My team hasn't won since 1972! :eek:

In terms of futility, NYC is to basketball what Boston is to hockey.

Oh, and BTW Sandra, you are sooooooo right about people saying Red Sox fans would become apathetic after 2004! :up
 
The Rangers and Red Sox- IMHO, before they won their respective championships, along with the Chicago Cubs, they were the three most cursed/unlucky teams in sports.
 
Sandra, at least your hockey team has won a championship since the advent of cable television! :eek:

My team hasn't won since 1972! :eek:

In terms of futility, NYC is to basketball what Boston is to hockey.

Oh, and BTW Sandra, you are sooooooo right about people saying Red Sox fans would become apathetic after 2004! :up

Hey there, We got cable here in 1970. :D
 
Did any one see this ?

Thankfully, GMs shot down dopey idea for pre-playoff tournament

Detroit -- The general managers got at least one thing right during their meetings last week. They shot down a proposal from New York Islanders owner Charles Wang to have a mini-tournament for the eighth and final playoff spot in each conference.

I know -- huh?

His proposal was to have the teams that finish eight through 15 in each conference play a week-long tournament to decide the eighth-place finisher. Never mind that 82-game regular season -- that was just a prelim.

The No. 8 team, the team that actually earned a playoff spot, would have to win it again, starting with the No. 15 seed and working back through the field -- No. 9 vs. No. 14, No. 10 vs. No. 13 and the always intriguing No. 11 vs. No. 12.

Advertisement

Come on. Is this the NHL or some youth league? Might as well not even keep score and let everybody have cake and ice cream after the games, right? Everybody's a winner in the new NHL.

The NHL already waters down regular-season games, awarding points to teams that don't win (overtime losses). Now you want to give teams a second chance to make the playoffs? Why not just have two 15-team playoff brackets? Everybody in, boys, have at it.

Stop it.

Add 'em up after 82 games and the best eight move on to the postseason. End of story. If you miss by a half-point, so be it. Do better next year.

There just isn't any need to manufacture fake drama at the end of the season. Look at the conference races right now. Going into Saturday, only nine points separated No. 3 from No. 9 in the West. And nine points separated No. 7 from No. 12.

The top teams have run away a bit in the East, but still only eight points separate No. 6 and No. 11.

Having a mini-tournament at the end of the regular season would completely take the starch out these final weeks of the regular season. Teams would just position themselves for the play-in tourney.

That said, there is one scenario where I would favor a play-in game -- game, not tournament. If there is a tie between the No. 8 and No. 9 teams -- like there was last season between Florida and Montreal -- eliminate all the tie-breakers and let them settle it on the ice. One game, winner in.

From The Detroit News: Thankfully, GMs shot down dopey idea for pre-playoff tournament | detnews.com | The Detroit News
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)