Should DTV Go This Way With The Next Server/Client Model?

  • WELCOME TO THE NEW SERVER!

    If you are seeing this you are on our new server WELCOME HOME!

    While the new server is online Scott is still working on the backend including the cachine. But the site is usable while the work is being completes!

    Thank you for your patience and again WELCOME HOME!

    CLICK THE X IN THE TOP RIGHT CORNER OF THE BOX TO DISMISS THIS MESSAGE
Status
Please reply by conversation.
i hate client server models
anything at the tv should have a tuner.
having a server that is a dvr only is ok, but the client should always have its own tuner for live viewing
 
I found some California proposition 65 compliant doc and it had an HS17-100 listed as Technicolor genie server on an AT&T document. Went to technicolors site and their recievers look cool with an LCD display. I miss having the time on the box like with cable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marcingak and cinsu
I found some California proposition 65 compliant doc and it had an HS17-100 listed as Technicolor genie server on an AT&T document. Went to technicolors site and their recievers look cool with an LCD display. I miss having the time on the box like with cable.

found the doc also
cant find any info on the actual box from directv or techicolor though

is it a uverse box?
 
Sorry that was that doc I found. Over at DSLReports forum they think the next server will go headless. I wonder if AT&T has decided to drop that and still go with one that outputs to 4k over HDMI using the Technicolor server?
 
i dont think att even knows whats next

but they really need to hop on the ball and get to it
 
  • Like
Reactions: AZ.
Status
Please reply by conversation.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 2)