Should DTV Go This Way With The Next Server/Client Model?

Status
Please reply by conversation.
i hate client server models
anything at the tv should have a tuner.
having a server that is a dvr only is ok, but the client should always have its own tuner for live viewing
 
I found some California proposition 65 compliant doc and it had an HS17-100 listed as Technicolor genie server on an AT&T document. Went to technicolors site and their recievers look cool with an LCD display. I miss having the time on the box like with cable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marcingak and cinsu
I found some California proposition 65 compliant doc and it had an HS17-100 listed as Technicolor genie server on an AT&T document. Went to technicolors site and their recievers look cool with an LCD display. I miss having the time on the box like with cable.

found the doc also
cant find any info on the actual box from directv or techicolor though

is it a uverse box?
 
Sorry that was that doc I found. Over at DSLReports forum they think the next server will go headless. I wonder if AT&T has decided to drop that and still go with one that outputs to 4k over HDMI using the Technicolor server?
 
i dont think att even knows whats next

but they really need to hop on the ball and get to it
 
  • Like
Reactions: AZ.
Status
Please reply by conversation.
***

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 2)

Latest posts