Should DTV Go This Way With The Next Server/Client Model? (1 Viewer)

Status
Please reply by conversation.

mdram

SatelliteGuys Pro
Aug 24, 2005
4,025
770
Md
i hate client server models
anything at the tv should have a tuner.
having a server that is a dvr only is ok, but the client should always have its own tuner for live viewing
 

cypherstream

SatelliteGuys Pro
Jul 6, 2010
601
60
PA
I found some California proposition 65 compliant doc and it had an HS17-100 listed as Technicolor genie server on an AT&T document. Went to technicolors site and their recievers look cool with an LCD display. I miss having the time on the box like with cable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marcingak and cinsu

mdram

SatelliteGuys Pro
Aug 24, 2005
4,025
770
Md
I found some California proposition 65 compliant doc and it had an HS17-100 listed as Technicolor genie server on an AT&T document. Went to technicolors site and their recievers look cool with an LCD display. I miss having the time on the box like with cable.

found the doc also
cant find any info on the actual box from directv or techicolor though

is it a uverse box?
 

CSM

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Pro
Aug 28, 2015
1,050
228
Chesterfield, MO
Sorry that was that doc I found. Over at DSLReports forum they think the next server will go headless. I wonder if AT&T has decided to drop that and still go with one that outputs to 4k over HDMI using the Technicolor server?
 

mdram

SatelliteGuys Pro
Aug 24, 2005
4,025
770
Md
i dont think att even knows whats next

but they really need to hop on the ball and get to it
 
  • Like
Reactions: AZ.
Status
Please reply by conversation.

Users who are viewing this thread

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Latest posts

Top