Baltimore VHF

Discussion in 'Over the Air TV By RabbitEars.Info' started by stvcmty, Oct 11, 2017.

  1. stvcmty

    stvcmty Topic Starter SatelliteGuys Family
    Pub Member / Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2013
    Posts:
    53
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Baldwin MD
    WJZ applied to use a non-directional antenna on RF11 to maximize their post repack signal. Licensing and Management System
    Right now Baltimore has a non-directional RF11 station, WBAL.
    If WJZ could use non directional operation on RF11 without interfering with other RF11 stations after the repack, could WBAL and WJZ submit some requests together to the FCC so WJZ moves to RF12, non-directional, and leave WBAL on RF11.

    The candelabra tower on TV hill is complicated. WMAR is asking to change channels in the same phase as WJZ and WBAL to allow all the top mounted antennas to be changed once. As things are planned now, WJZ, WBAL, and WMAR will all end up with new top mounted antennas on the candelabra. Perhaps my thought above is not ideal because then WJZ and WMAR would get new antennas but WBAL would keep their current antenna.

    Maybe WBAL would want to be re-assigned because they get some extra coverage out of it due to HAAT changes and matching the largest station in the market.
     
  2. *** WELCOME TO SATELLITEGUYS! ***
  3. Trip

    Trip RabbitEars Webmaster
    Staff Member HERE TO HELP YOU!

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Posts:
    901
    Likes Received:
    351
    Location:
    Alexandria, VA, US
    They could, but then WBAL wouldn't get new equipment. I assume they will want new equipment.

    - Trip
     
  4. stvcmty

    stvcmty Topic Starter SatelliteGuys Family
    Pub Member / Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2013
    Posts:
    53
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Baldwin MD
    I was thinking that too.
     
  5. Voyager6

    Voyager6 Just lost in space
    Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Posts:
    6,996
    Likes Received:
    2,389
    Location:
    Sol 3
    Sometimes things just don't make sense. WJZ is moving from 13 to 11. WBAL is moving from 11 to 12. Wouldn't the logical move have been to move WJZ to 12 and leave WBAL at 11? Why require both to get new antennas? Is there some technical reason to move WBAL to 12 instead of staying at 11?
     
  6. Geronimo

    Geronimo Supporting Founder
    Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Posts:
    11,102
    Likes Received:
    710
    I doubt that they are doing it just to give WBAL new equipment. Having said that while I have seen the question posted in may places i have never seen a particularly good answer. Hopefully someone else knows the answer.
     
  7. Trip

    Trip RabbitEars Webmaster
    Staff Member HERE TO HELP YOU!

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Posts:
    901
    Likes Received:
    351
    Location:
    Alexandria, VA, US
    It's because of pre-existing interference relationships with other stations that had to be moved around. To be specific, this is at least partially the fault of WGBY moving to high-VHF. WGBY was assigned to channel 13. To make it fit there, among other things, stations in New York, Scranton, and Baltmore are swapped to 12. Philadelphia and Martinsburg are swapped to 13. Martinsburg on 13 meant WVEC couldn't be there; it landed on 11. WVEC is already short-spaced to WJZ, but could not be co-channel to WBAL. Thus, WBAL, and not WJZ, was moved onto 12, and WJZ went to 11.

    - Trip
     
    navychop and pamajestic like this.



***

Separate names with a comma.

More...