Galaxy 19 Ku Low Signal Quality

Status
Not open for further replies.
N4ST

N4ST

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Family
Original poster
Apr 23, 2006
66
1
Jersey, VA
I have re-pointed two different Ku systems from 101° to 97° and am having a tough time getting decent signal levels on Galaxy 19. Both systems are using 90cm dishes and Mercury II receivers with a single LNB. I bought a new LNB for my dish to see if if made any difference. Nope. After much nudging and budging, the best I can do is low 30s in signal quality. Both systems were working fine on AMC4.

I'm in Virginia. Is anyone in the Mid-Atlantic area doing any better?
 
L

Lak7

SatelliteGuys Master
Pub Member / Supporter
Feb 28, 2008
5,451
7
Near Chicago, Illinois
What TP are you using to peak with?
There was a test done recently, that if you peaked using a particular TP, the others were a little weak.
 
phlatwound

phlatwound

SatelliteGuys Pro
Lifetime Supporter
Dec 25, 2007
3,285
267
Goosapeak Junction
I know it probably wouldn't make a whole lot of difference but did you play with your LNB skew any?
 
N4ST

N4ST

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Family
Original poster
Apr 23, 2006
66
1
Jersey, VA
I peaked on 11842, because that was the primary target.

I played with the skew, which has a fairly slow peaking response.

Don't get me wrong, I ended up with ~200 watchable TV channels on Galaxy 19, but the margin is so very low compared to AMC4. A little rain and I've got nothing.
 
Wescopc

Wescopc

SatelliteGuys Pro
Pub Member / Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
Sep 11, 2005
1,899
209
Canby, Oregon
Using string - one vertical and one horizontal - test to see if the dish is absolutely flat across the front face. AMC 4 was a stronger signal then G19. So it is essential for the dish to have an excellent parabolic surface.
Bob
 
M

McGuyver

SatelliteGuys Pro
Apr 4, 2007
783
2
Nuclear Testing Grounds
Yesterday I also noticed the 11842 was quite low compared to others but I was still getting something in the 60's % if I remember correctly, some other TP's were in the high 90's %, so I knew I had the dish aimed correctly. I'm in So California. I hope they finalize this bird, looks like they may be tweaking it still.
 
N4ST

N4ST

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Family
Original poster
Apr 23, 2006
66
1
Jersey, VA
I did the "string thing" a couple of years ago on my dish and had about 1/2" gap where the strings crossed. I flexed the dish (without removing it from the pole) until the strings just kissed. I had checked my Father-in-Law's, before I mounted it, on a concrete floor (and yes I rotated the dish to make sure it wasn't the floor out of whack). I flexed that one until the rim touched all the way around on the floor. I probably should recheck to see if these dishes have "memory" and gradually have re-warped. Good suggestion.
 
M

McGuyver

SatelliteGuys Pro
Apr 4, 2007
783
2
Nuclear Testing Grounds
I did the "string thing" a couple of years ago on my dish and had about 1/2" gap where the strings crossed. I flexed the dish (without removing it from the pole) until the strings just kissed. I had checked my Father-in-Law's, before I mounted it, on a concrete floor (and yes I rotated the dish to make sure it wasn't the floor out of whack). I flexed that one until the rim touched all the way around on the floor. I probably should recheck to see if these dishes have "memory" and gradually have re-warped. Good suggestion.

If you have one good eye you can sight the dish from the sides and top and compare the edges, I can usually see any sign of warpage, then take it from there. If you use string, you'll have to move the string around the dish and check from various locations, the eyeball test may not be as accurate but it's a quicker way.

One more idea, with your TV & stb connected close by and the signal meter visible on the screen, try flexing the dish gently in various locations to see how the signal responds, this helps a lot to tell you if the dish is out of alignment or warped.
 
Babadem

Babadem

SatelliteGuys Pro
May 21, 2007
2,297
164
MA
I peaked on 11842, because that was the primary target.

I played with the skew, which has a fairly slow peaking response.

Don't get me wrong, I ended up with ~200 watchable TV channels on Galaxy 19, but the margin is so very low compared to AMC4. A little rain and I've got nothing.
:eek: No!!! Use either of these transponders here.
 
M

Mr Tony

SatelliteGuys Pro
Supporting Founder
Nov 17, 2003
691
457
Mankato, MN
yeah if you peak on 11842 there are some others that wont come in then
 
N4ST

N4ST

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Family
Original poster
Apr 23, 2006
66
1
Jersey, VA
Good to Go!

What a big dummy (I am)! Always watchful of the distant treeline to make sure they don't interfere with the birds I need, when I re-pointed for Galaxy 19 I didn't notice a limb encroaching from a near tree that was ABOVE my dish. I thought it was well above my line-of-sight, but a quick check by sighting down a digital level told me it was a problem. Who would have thought that swinging the dish 4° to the East would cause a problem. Now I have an SQ in the upper 50's on my Mercury II and on my Twinhan, so life is good. Sorry, for the false alarm. :eek:
 
Last edited:
ebms1

ebms1

SatelliteGuys Pro
Jun 15, 2007
150
0
:eek: No!!! Use either of these transponders here.

here at home i use a .75 to point at the t5 @the 97 ... i get it very easy ... but in the field that sat is very hard to point to ... it is usually very picky....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

K
Replies
14
Views
435
FTA4PA
FTA4PA
A
Replies
11
Views
2K
cyberham
cyberham
D
Replies
7
Views
1K
cyberham
cyberham
A
Replies
2
Views
996
Hyper Casey
Hyper Casey

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

  • N4ST

Latest posts

Top