it just means he still won against a level playing field. i have other concerns.
supposedly, authorities were suspicious during those years he was winning. did they do anything about it, of course not. armstrong certainly was not the only top tier cyclist who went to elaborate means to cheat. they claim he put make up on to cover his needle marks. yet, no one thinks the first thing that will smear in the hot french sun is make up. my problem continues to be how lax the powers that be were in their drug testing. were they taking bribes from armstrong only? we all know that cycling is among the dirtiest sports out there. there are others who need to be indicted to the degree that armstrong is.
i look at him and i see someone who beat stage 4 cancer which spread to his brain and lungs. i do not view him any lesser than i did in 2000.