Soon to be 93 W* bird if approved by the FCC

N5XZS

SatelliteGuys Master
Original poster
Jan 23, 2005
5,075
3,076
Albuquerque, NM, USA
Here's the link on Ku band footprint from 93 W* bird.


So far no news on whether they are going to use video and radios feeds.😎 :hungry2 :hatsoff
 
Hopefully, it will be a satellite for us (video and radio)!

Since their filing a couple of months ago to request the Ku band, I put an LNB on my 99/105 dish in anticipation. Just waiting for a signal (after approval) to tweak the LNB!

We need a "new" (just a few years old) satellite for Ku, most of the others are getting "long in the tooth".
 
I scanned that location early this morning and I found three transponders, but no channels. Unless they're bleeding over from 95W. I haven't scanned that because it's supposed to be all DirecTV.

I tried again just a little while ago and got nothing. So either they're not full-time, or they're on the satellite at 95W that's in an inclined orbit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Keith Brannen
My LNB for 93w needs a signal to tweak it, but I do now and then get a bleed-over from 91w, which has 11 transponders with a SR of 63999 (according to my Amiko). So you could be getting bleed-over from there.

EDIT: 11 transponders, not 6 as first typed.
 
Last edited:
When I blind scan the wasteland of Ku from 89W through 95W using two different receivers and two different systems, I see no tps at all right now. My receivers may not be capable of receiving above SR 60000. I am using USALS which could be off a little but blind scanning would often pick up tps even if not pointing absolutely precisely at the satellite and even if not locked.

Added: Tried a third receiver (GT Media V9 Prime) and now am picking up multiple (seven) SR 63999 tps on 91W.

PLEASE LOG IN TO GET RID OF THESE ADS!
 
My LNB for 93w needs a signal to tweak it, but I do now and then get a bleed-over from 91w, which has 11 transponders with a SR of 63999 (according to my Amiko). So you could be getting bleed-over from there.

EDIT: 11 transponders, not 6 as first typed.
The ones I saw had a much lower symbol rate. I think it was 15500, which is kind of distinctive, maybe it'll mean something to someone.

The Edision supposedly scans up to 60000. I wonder what's going on with the 63999 -- are they on the Bell satellite, or something else? I haven't scanned 91W in a long time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Keith Brannen
Just did a scan again and got nothing from 91 or 93.

PLEASE LOG IN TO GET RID OF THESE ADS!
 

Streaming from receivers to PC

Autumnal Equinox Christmas