I really understand that point of view. But I think I understand where they are coming from too. I think they are looking the fact I would guess that AAD was likely less that say 2%(I think that is most likely over generous). That they had to put all the markets across the entire country one spots. So they want to recover the monies they spent on doing that. Then the small blip that is distances just isn't worth it to them. I remember the "good old days" of getting any net from anywhere myself. It was really great to be able to get an E time zone market and then if the timers didn't work out you could pick up the W feed. It was a good ride, but unfortunately it looks much like it is coming to an end. Maybe we will see them do it off 77° but if I were you I wouldn't hold my breathe.I don't think it is too much of a waste of bandwidth to offer the same amount of distant network programming as they always have, just a few markets. In my personal opinion there is no valid technological reason why this has to be the end of distant network programming. The loss of ADD is the loss of distant network programming from what I am reading on here. I don't want to be calling in every time I am outside of my spot beam. I'm usually able to receive local programming with antenna if needed. With distant networks I may not live in a market but I like to be able to enjoy that markets local news and programming and the different schedules due to time differences. Sometimes a show I missed in the time zone I am in can be caught in the later time zone feed even if I missed recording it. I've always had distant networks on satellite. Satellite will not be satellite without this to me. I am very disappointed this will be going away. Do I have any influence over this situation? It appears not. whatchel1 this is what I should have said my apologies.