More news about C-band and possibly 5 new Ku band satellites

Advertisements

N5XZS

SatelliteGuys Master
Original poster
Jan 23, 2005
5,259
3,299
Albuquerque, NM, USA
Latest news on C band and possibly 5 new Ku band satellites from the FCC's possible vote for 2nd round C-band auction. :rolleyes:


Have fun reading the story!!:hatsoff2
 
Latest news on C band and possibly 5 new Ku band satellites from the FCC's possible vote for 2nd round C-band auction. :rolleyes:


Have fun reading the story!!:hatsoff2
That'll be all she wrote for FTA for most of us... Won't be able to get a filter for this one.
 
...There's very little I can't get elsewhere, and with much less effort...
This really is true. Anybody who can investigate IPTV, even using your satellite receiver such as the Edision as your receiving tool for research, should do so. There are so many IPTV channels available from all over the world (and in the clear...) that you can't explore them all.

Yet, I like satellite reception first if it's available.
 
The problem with Ku is rain/snow fade. Even with a properly aimed 4 foot dish (old Channel Master dish used for PrimeStar back in the day), you can still lose signal in heavy rain or blinding snow (especially when snow starts to fill the dish). C-band is susceptible to snow buildup too, but it usually takes a little longer for the snow accumulation to disrupt the signal. I can't imagine broadcast stations wanting to have to rely on Ku, especially if they can get a reliable broadband feed.

The problem with IPTV is it's kind of like using Napster back in the day. It's great until the IPTV service gets raided and then you suddenly lose service any money you have prepaid, and the feds have your name and address. When you watch a satellite feed, no one but you knows what you are watching or how you are receiving it unless you choose to tell someone.

Anyway, here;s another article on the subject:
The FCC Wants to Sell Spectrum ABC, CBS, FOX, & NBC Use To Broadcast Their Signals to Improve 5G Wireless Service
 
  • Like
Reactions: k4otl
...It's great until the IPTV service gets raided and then you suddenly lose service any money you have prepaid, and the feds have your name and address...
I think you're talking about different IPTV than me. I don't pay any money for what I watch. I don't get secret codes distributed by dubious providers. Many of the IPTV streams are available on the open Internet but it's just more convenient centralizing stream access via the IPTV function on the satellite receiver. Pluto or Tubi TV are examples. If you're streaming high-dollar sports functions or popular concerts, then you know what you're doing and you must accept the consequences, if any.
 
Pluto or Tubi TV

Those are FAST services. IPTV streams are usually m3u links to premium channels. I may or may not have used them a few times mainly for sports I couldn't watch anywhere else, but always with a VPN

Christoph Waltz GIF by The Roku Channel
 
  • Haha
Reactions: primestar31
Those are FAST services. IPTV streams are usually m3u links...
There are still thousands of non-FAST sources. News including international from unfamiliar sources where you'll get a different point-of-view, movies, foreign channels. All m3u links. If you're looking for what's on regular cable channels then you need cable or the other kind of IPTV. Explore open IPTV and you'll discover stuff you never knew existed. Who knew there were Entrepreneur and Pet Collective channels? Kind of like C-band in the early days.
 
Clicking dubious links on the internet can be risky business... that's why I'd care ;)
My "Who cares..." comment referred to WWE/TNA. A little editorial comment.

I agree there is risk with clicking on some Internet links. I usually yield to the warnings of my virus checker when manually doing the clicking on my PC. When browsing via my satellite receiver and streaming an IPTV link, I think there is less risk.

Anyway, hopefully Ku will benefit at the same time C loses its bandwidth.
 

123w

A History of Free-to-Air Satellite TV in the US By Mike Kohl