Canadian gov't to push cable providers to unbundle channels

  • WELCOME TO THE NEW SERVER!

    If you are seeing this you are on our new server WELCOME HOME!

    While the new server is online Scott is still working on the backend including the cachine. But the site is usable while the work is being completes!

    Thank you for your patience and again WELCOME HOME!

    CLICK THE X IN THE TOP RIGHT CORNER OF THE BOX TO DISMISS THIS MESSAGE
I think it's a step in the right direction,just a shame it takes an act of government to unbundle channels.
 
It was the government that created the whole mess in the first place. It was an attempt to cram Canadian culture down our throats and limit USA programming.
 
I wonder what will happen for current shaw subs? The PQ is so much better :)
 
The two largest cable and satellite TV service providers — Bell and Rogers — offer subscribers basic packages that include the main television networks and selected other channels. But upgraded packages, at a higher cost, have channels bundled together by category or viewing interest.
Quebec’s Videotron has recently offered subscribers the ability to choose five individual channels at a time from a list of choices, on top of their basic service. Bell has also offered a similar pricing structure, but only in Quebec.
Canada’s broadcast regulator, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, urged cable and satellite companies in 2011 to adopt a pick-and-pay pricing model when it unveiled new regulations aimed at preventing television broadcasters from restricting consumer choice.
In response, Rogers experimented with a type of à la carte pricing in the winter of 2011-2012, offering consumers in London, Ont., a so-called “skinny basic” package for about $20, then charging an extra $26 or more to customers who wanted to pick 15, 20 or 30 extra channels.
But others, including Shaw Communications Inc., resisted such a pricing model and it was never made mandatory. Moore said it’s about time for that to happen.


Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/busines...le+satellite/9034903/story.html#ixzz2hlMHi5Im
 
This was Look TVs platform back in the day.. the late 90s and early 2000s. 20$ for 20 channels. Catch was 10 had to be Canadian.

Cheers, K

PS- Look was a wireless tv provider.
 
A-La-Carte programming wont happen anytime soon in Canada and by soon I mean in the next 12 years.
Considering Bell, Rogers and Telus basically own the CRTC, no way they'll agree to this format as it would result in
millions in losses per year each.

Unlike Dish and DTV, everything is bundled strategically with Canadian providers. Each "pack" has one or two channels you want followed by 5 you dont".
Example, TSN is in one pack, TSN 2 on the other

If you simply wanted: TSN, CNN, A/E, History, National Geographic, TLC, AMC, FX and Nick.. youre looking at 5 different themes at 7$ per oin top on the manditory "basics" at 35$

Simply put... S*** adds up

Unless the Canadian "big3", who are literally nobodies in the world, decide to make each channel 8$ then it wont happen.

Cheers, K
 
Bell has changed their packages a little now. The customer has 4 choices. Good/Select/Better/Best. No more individual theme packs, no more separate HD Theme packs HD/SD all included together by tier. Of course the premium movie channels are still extra add on's. I have yet to figure out if this is better or worse for the customer.
 
The problem with all the bundles, packages etc. is that we are forced to pay for channels that we do not want.

If the CRTC is really concerned with the consumer's choices then they should allow Dish and DirectTV into the Canadian Market.
 
Last edited:
The problem with all the bundles, packages etc. is that we are forced to pay for channels that we do not want.

If the CRTC is really concerned with the consumer's choices then they should allow Dish and DirectTV into the Canadian Market.

So true.. you end up with like 60 when all you want is 12.

Cheers, K
 
Most consumers won't save. There'll be a "must carry" package for $20 to $25/month plus a "must buy" 1 Canadian service for each American service.

The potential losers are Bell and Shaw Cat 2 channels which show the same programs on 17 services and the Bell/Rogers sports channels when subs cut the service when sports they don't want are in season.
 
Dishnetwork is now selling systems to Canadians on a month to month basis if they provide an American Address. Once they have it they can bring it back home with them.

If the CRTC is really concerned with the consumer's choices then they should allow Dish and DirectTV into the Canadian Market.
 
Bell has changed their packages a little now. The customer has 4 choices. Good/Select/Better/Best. No more individual theme packs, no more separate HD Theme packs HD/SD all included together by tier. Of course the premium movie channels are still extra add on's. I have yet to figure out if this is better or worse for the customer.

I have the impression that the new choices are worse, in the old pacakges you had to start with the basics, but then you could add more channels a la carte to complement your package, the trick: there was a limited number of channels to select from, or you had to upgrade package.

Now, if you wanted to add say, CNN International a la carte you could select their International News 1 mini combo for $3 (Incl CNN I and CP24).

If you wanted to add only TCM, you´d have to buy the Super Channel combo for $13, again including a number of channels you may not want.


Under the new packages, all of them are pre-assembled, and now say you want to add only CNN International, it isn´t available anymore as individual channel or mini-combo, you´d have to add the Learning and News bundle for $10 that includes CNN International plus some other channels you don´t want.

Now for TCM you have to upgrade to the Better pack, and now I don´t see it as part of a mini-combo.

But either way, under the old or new packages, you´re stuck paying with channels you don´t want.
 
Watch Haper's throne speech today. yeah that a-la-carte thing is nothing more than an election ploy.
Bob and I will be living on Mars before that happens.

K
 
All that the providers will be doing is re-schuffling the same old crap to make it appear they are offering something new. Same old dog and pony show. And if anything, our rates will increase because of the re-packaging. And as usual the providers will blame the CRTC for the rate increases. Its a win-win for them.
 
And this issue has been mentioned since several years ago, but still nothing has happened.

[h=1]Cable firms allowed to 'unbundle' by 2010 by Barbara Shecter[/h]Mar 1, 2006
[h=2]Source : National Post [/h][h=2]CRTC's 'pick-and-pay' policy [/h]A new broadcast policy that will allow Canadian viewers more opportunity to pay only for channels they want is bound to have an impact on the size of monthly cable bills.
But research and opinion is divided on whether cable bills will increase or decrease.
By 2010, cable operators will be allowed to "unbundle" individual channels from pre-set packages, if 85% of subscribers receive channels digitally rather than in the old analogue format, according to Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission policy.
Rising cable bills have been at the heart of a fierce debate in the United States over moving to a pick-and-pay system. A U.S. Federal Communications Commission study concluded this month that choosing individual channels would reduce cable bills by as much as 13%.
Those results conflicted with a 2004 study by the FCC, which said cable bills could increase by as much as 30% through pick and pay. But FCC officials now say the earlier study was flawed because faulty data were obtained from the cable industry.

http://www.friends.ca/news-item/1489
 
In the case of Shaw Direct, one of the things that I don´t quite understand is their bundles:

For example the bundle called FYI with news channels, includes MTV, mmmm :confused:

The bundle called Coool Stuff, includes DejaView, Slice, History 2, MTV 2, BET, they seem to be so different, so cool for who ? :confused:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)