what would the measurments of the focal point (using the string method) be for this dish? until he can put his lnb at the focal point he'll just be spinning his wheels. (I was in a similar situation as I bought a 1m Winegard Starchoice dish off a guy for 20bucks. The guy broke the original arm so he bodged up a replacement out of tube steel but the focal point was wrong. It was good enough for Starchoice. I couldn't get anything until I saw other dishes on here, realized the fp was wrong, then used the winegard fp diagram and string method to fix my dish)
oleholo: do any channel names scan in? this will help to confirm what satellite your pointed at. google these three webpages "lyngsat package 110w" "lyngsat package 119w" and "lyngsat package 91w" then look for anything familar
The measurements were given, right, by those red ribbons which showed my LNBF was short by some length. However, as AV has mentioned that the EchoStar's signal was so strong even with short position my receiver could get strong reception hence scanned hundreds scrambled channels.
I don't remember if there were some familiar channels of 97W scanned in. I think AV was right, I was in the illusion of getting Galaxy 97W under the strong influence of EchoStar 110W (I was DUI; Driven crazy Under Influence of 110W
).
Anyway, after having AV's "ammunition" (geosat generated info) and more confidence that my existing linear LNBF was trash plus a big hope from the strong signal captured by my Bell LNBF, today I just stepped out to Digiwave store and bought a better LNBF.
Couldn't wait any longer for Saturday, I just put on the new linear LNBF (the L type like my Bell type) and checked. Voila! although I believe I should work more on the positions (azimuth, elevation, exact LNBF skew angle, etc) I got some Q signal at 97W with some different TPs. As it's night and short time before I went out, I didn't take any notes. But unlike with the circular LNBF with this one the Q fluctuated from 10 to 50 in one TP, and from 0 to 20 in another TPs. It's hard to get the constant high percentage, like 61 or more as when I used the circular LNBF. BTW, the LNBF position in its arm has to be adjusted as the arm holder didn't really provide the required position.
On Saturday, I'll buy the compass and measure the azimuth correctly (to be honest with you I didn't measure the angle precisely, but approximately), check the elevation and the LNBF skew angle. For now nothing I can do with the LNBF arm. It's butchered but unlike a goat can't be eaten
.
Wish me luck, friends.