Gameplay has to be good to begin with, FPS can certainly help with that, but it's not automatic.
The latter part of your post though is just all marketing really.
The latter part of your post though is just all marketing really.
Those things don't make a game "good" but I'd argue that 60 FPS is definitely better than 30 FPS. 60 FPS basically means better gameplay, which in my mind is paramount over better visuals. Hell, there are NES games that ran at 60 FPS.
The funny thing is that as far as publishers are concerned, the FPS thing goes both ways. If they can pull it off, like in the Master Chief Collection, the publisher is like, "Look! 60 FPS! This game is so much better now!" If they CAN'T pull it off, then they'll either say, "Well, we want to game to look the best that it possibly can!" (Naughty Dog) or "30 FPS is just more 'cinematic' (Ubisoft). Personally I'd prefer Uncharted 4 sacrifice some visual fidelity in order to get a 60 FPS experience, but that's just me. And Naughty Dog can't act like 60 FPS isn't a selling point. It was a predominant selling point of The Last of Us Remastered and basically every reviewer said the game was more fun at 60 as opposed to 30 FPS.
I'm really really new to the gaming world. Got a ps4 the beginning of last month. Have far cry 4, need for speed rivals & call of duty advanced warfare.
So far it has been a lot of fun. The hardest part is learning the controls. Every time I play it gets a little easier. Need for speed is really tuff with the controls.
Prefer the offline mode, the few online games I tried just got me flat out annihilated. When I get better that may be fun to do.
Call of duty playing role of "Mitchell" is a blast, getting much better on it. Still on recruit, after this campaign I up the difficulty.
Anyone picking up The Order? Full play through on YouTube clocks in a 5 hours. Stop and smell the roses pace pushes the time closer to double digits.
Anyone picking up The Order? Full play through on YouTube clocks in a 5 hours. Stop and smell the roses pace pushes the time closer to double digits.
The review embargo has been lifted for "The Order: 1886." Reviews are pretty mixed, skewing more towards the negative. The overriding theme seems to be that it looks absolutely beautiful, but there's very little in terms of an actual game, and the story isn't that great either. Good thing I have it just for a rental.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/2wfblc/the_order_1886_review_thread/
A couple of reviewers have called this the "PS4's Ryse." Thing is, such a title would be expected at launch, not well over a year after the console was released..
I stopped at Family Video today. Both of their copies of The Order were gone before I got there but I did find out the rental prices. For new release games it's $3 for 1 night, $5 for 3 nights, or $7 for 5 nights. If you do 5 nights you also get a free new release movie rental. Older games are the same prices but they are rent 1 get one free.
For a short game like The Order that you can beat in a weekend, $5 for 3 nights would be perfect. I actually probably would have taken the 5 days and a new release blu-ray rental for $7. For kids who don't have any money but tons of time those 5 day rentals would be great. They could probably beat 20ish hour games in that time. For me it's not realistic for anything except for extremely short games like The Order.
Those rental prices are insane! When I first started gaming in 2007, I checked out renting at Blockbuster, which had as many storefronts in my neighborhood as Starbucks at the time, and their prices (if I remember correctly) were like $15 for a 5 or 7-day rental. I actually looked into Redboxing The Order this weekend, but the local kiosks had a very poor selection of older games. Maybe in a couple of months I'll check again.